The Nature of criticism by Herbert Read.

         The Nature of criticism by Herbert Read.

                                                          

Nature of criticism is an essay which talks about the the inclusion of scientific elements or I notional appreciation. There are many goods which are used to criticism a work of art. Because perhaps Coleridge who tried to give literary criticism. A scientific approach by reluctant it through the technique aspects of the process of philosophy. In traditional criticism the structure of emotional analysis was important but now it has perished and every body is trying to look at the rationality of art.

Auny science covers the large validity of every field and it is evaluated from that point of view. In order to analysis literature aesthetic Cally you may have to considers all the application which are social and ethical in nature.

We have there fore differentiated one kind of literary criticism to another which results into individualistic literary criticism. Taking into psychology it is only concesred with the process of mentally activity. Where is literary criticism takes into account the product. As per psychology, art is only an expression of mentality and it does not take into consideration. The literary values. There is phycho analysis in the redu tion of the symbol to its proper origin.

On art there are many symbols and according to “ Alfred Adles “ the all reaction of a work of art arises from.its synthesis as a matter of fact this shows that general limitations of psychological criticism are evident and moving towards phycho analysis and its relation to literary criticism. We it is note concerned with literature than criticism.

One of the misuses of this kind of criticism is that no literature can come out of the schematic under standing of life . It has to deal with the experiences of life.

On the basis of what I under stand I could fit word three basis wishes…

1. What general function does psycho analysis give to literature.
2. How does psycho analysis explain the process of poetic creation and inspiration.
3. Thud, psycho analysis cause to ext and in any way the function of criticism.

According to Herbert Read there are three people who can talk about phycho analysis in the best ship, there are.

1. Fronde
2. Jung
3. Alder

In turms of general function of literature Jung is one of the three to writes about it in detaid as he talks about the general principles of contrasting attitude.

1. Intro Version
2. Extra Version

There is a strong division of self and there for there is a lot of different between…..

1. Subject and Object
2. Thoughts and Feelings
3. Ideas and Theme

Any contrasting attitude is an out come of specific activity. Which unites them and separates them . This activity assorting to Jung is fantasy. There for it can be said that work of art requires fantasy for optimism imagination.

The second aspect for the social validity of any particular symbol is very important. Simple and literature is more intelligent them. The normal unconscious symbol of philosophy.

Any criticize mind is capable of psycho analysis and in any mind three are two contrary tendencies.

1. Being conelous
2. Being imaginativ

The control problem of literary criticism at present is the question between romanticism and classicism. The complexity between classicism and romanticism gives birth to the inspiration which is some time not at all anxious in nature.

Modern psychologist plugin inspiration as the activity of ideas. Which are combined together satisfactorily does not have any format to understand the motion. Any inspiration his an out came of effective processes.

First there are thoughts , which get converted in to ideas, those are converted into mental images, which tailgate on turn into physical from which will either be selected or rejected.

White con ceiling the Image there are a lot of images going on together in once mind from which one either reject or select.

Any creative work starts when an axat word or Image is formed . It is almost the same as the dynamic relationship between life and soul from the 18th century own word inspiration has become an aesthetic term.

The classical and the romantic iterators work totally different in their attitudes but to.antic writing was always subjective in nature, which required psycho analysis to be done the basic role of phycho analysis is about dealing with the artistic creation.

Crude in his study said that the fantacy turns into imagination and that later on terns into creation which is of optimum aesthetic value.

On this bases crude explains the individuals in three levels…

1. I'd
2. Ego
3. Super ego

In I'd there are no values no goof or no evil or no morality it is driven by pleasure. There is no idea of time logic or anything else there is nothing rational in Id.

The Ego is the main present of reality it unifies the basis mental process and organised for moral and social aims.

The super ego is something very different from I'd and Ego and it is absolutely following the rules and regulation of the society.

Super Ego strives for perfection which is relented to the higher think in life. There for any work of art desires its inspiration from I'd.

And where is there for a product of the unconscious mind responding to the quality of conscious mind.

There is something nob as the abnormal mentality for how the artist for which the mainmast has to be understood and for that individual psychology is taken into consideration.

In order to become an artist and study in art one has to do phycho analysis because you may have understand the newrofic tendency of an alrtist.

Psycho analysis finds in art a system of symbol which represent a bidder relation and why analyzing them you can understand them and testify the jauntiness of symbol.

It takes about the question that does psycho analysis modify in any way our consent of critics function. Clear modification is very difficult to achieve but it may give you an understanding of their attitude to the function of psychology.

There are some questions which may have no reasons for example the case of “ Hamlet “ to hesitated in seeking the revenge of his fathers murder.

According to Coleridge, Hamlet was a very kind heated person and as a result he was not capable ti taking any Dionysian on it. There for Robertson says that Hamlet can be understood from within.

According to Dr.Johnson psychological explanation can give this answer through the understanding of from.

%...Oedipus

This can in a way give answer ti the reason of his fathers murder one can applied the teary of psycho analysis to literary criticism and discover the strange this and unfamiliar areas of human mind. In this way psycho analysis tries to resolve the conflict and allow us to come to the common stand points.

According Jung there are two fundamental ……..

1. Extroverted
2. Introverted

Form both of theme one is visible and another is imaginably there for psycho analysis should take of a position and must try ti broaden the horizon of criticism.

Understanding is the our come of experiences which can be both individual as well as collective but according ti, Jung the mind built up credential Images which eventually turn into some kind of myths or religion truth, which they find expression in literature.

There for we can say that psycho analysis has to into the myths for actually understanding the poetic imagination and it can be only we done by building hypothesis.  The mind of the psycho analysis has to unite everything in order to criticism any particularity work and solve the problems.